Current:Home > StocksTokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages -FutureProof Finance
Tokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages
View
Date:2025-04-18 03:39:38
TOKYO (AP) — A Tokyo court on Tuesday held only the operator of the tsunami-wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant responsible for paying damages to dozens of evacuees.
The Tokyo High Court also slashed the amount to half of what the lower court had ordered and relieved the government of responsibility — a decision that plaintiffs and their lawyers criticized as belittling their suffering and the severity of the disaster.
The court ordered only the Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, known as TEPCO, to pay a total of 23.5 million yen ($165,000) to 44 of the 47 plaintiffs, while not holding the government accountable.
Tuesday’s ruling apparently backpedaled from an earlier decision in March 2018, when the Tokyo District Court held both the government and TEPCO accountable for the disaster, which the ruling said could have been prevented if they both took better precautionary measures, ordering both to pay 59 million yen ($414,400) in damages.
The decision comes at a time when Japan’s government tries to accelerate reactor restarts to maximize nuclear energy to meet decarbonization targets, while seeking to tone down the impact of the nuclear disaster 13 years ago, and its memory gradually fades.
Three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant melted after a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami hit on March 11, 2011, releasing massive amounts of radiation in the area and displacing more than 160,000 people at one point. About 27,000 of them are still unable to return home.
The government has pushed for the decontamination of affected areas and the reopening of no-go zones, and has urged evacuees to return to their homes while cutting back support for them. The government-set compensation program, which is mostly based on distance from the plant and radiation levels, has triggered divisions and discrimination among communities.
The dispute centers on whether the government could have foreseen the risk of a massive tsunami, and whether the disaster could have been averted if the government had ordered the utility to take precautions.
In the ruling, judge Hiro Misumi said the flooding of the plant because of the tsunami wasn’t preventable even if the industry ministry used its authority and ordered the utility to enhance a seawall based on a tsunami estimate at that time.
The decision is among the four rulings that apparently came in line with the June 2022 Supreme Court decision that said the government wasn’t liable for the disaster and that the disaster from a tsunami that high wasn’t foreseeable or preventable.
Motomitsu Nakagawa, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said that Tuesday’s high court ruling was “almost a mere copy and paste” of the top court decision and that it “makes me infuriated.”
Nakagawa said the ruling takes the disaster-hit residents’ suffering lightly, and the reduction of the amount of compensation is also tantamount to saying that the operator can get away with paying only that much damage in a disaster.
He said that he planned to discuss a possible appeal to the Supreme Court after consulting with his clients.
Yuya Kamoshita, who has evacuated to Tokyo from Iwaki, south of the Fukushima Daiichi plant with his family, said the ruling was unacceptable because it trivialized the evacuees’ sufferings, and failed to hold the government accountable even though the nuclear power plant was operated as part of the national energy policy.
veryGood! (385)
Related
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Why Sean Diddy Combs Sex Trafficking Case Was Reassigned to a New Judge
- What's the 'Scariest House in America'? HGTV aims to find out
- Judge denies an order sought by a Black student who was punished over his hair
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Stellantis recalls nearly 130,000 Ram 1500 pickup trucks for a turn signal malfunction
- In Competitive Purple Districts, GOP House Members Paint Themselves Green
- California vineyard owner says he was fined $120K for providing free housing to his employee
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Harris is heading to North Carolina to survey Helene’s aftermath one day after Trump visited
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Takeaways from AP’s report on affordable housing disappearing across the U.S.
- IRS doubles number of states eligible for its free Direct File for tax season 2025
- Kirk Cousins stats today: Falcons QB joins exclusive 500-yard passing game list
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- How Trump credits an immigration chart for saving his life and what the graphic is missing
- How Gigi Hadid, Brody Jenner, Erin Foster and Katharine McPhee Share the Same Family Tree
- Is Boar's Head deli meat safe to eat? What experts say amid listeria outbreak
Recommendation
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
After the deluge, the lies: Misinformation and hoaxes about Helene cloud the recovery
Ohio court refers case brought by citizens’ group against Trump, Vance to prosecutors
Regulators investigate possible braking error in over 360,000 Ford crossover SUVs
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
Counterfeit iPhone scam lands pair in prison for ripping off $2.5 million from Apple
Hilary Swank Gets Candid About Breastfeeding Struggles After Welcoming Twins
Why this $10,000 Toyota Hilux truck is a great affordable camper