Current:Home > MyAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -FutureProof Finance
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
Poinbank View
Date:2025-04-08 15:13:23
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (82)
Related
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Microsoft's new AI chatbot has been saying some 'crazy and unhinged things'
- Trump receives a target letter in Jan. 6 special counsel investigation
- 2 more eyedrop brands are recalled due to risks of injury and vision problems
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Trump receives a target letter in Jan. 6 special counsel investigation
- Nordstrom says it will close its Canadian stores and cut 2,500 jobs
- Florida Judge Asked to Recognize the Legal Rights of Five Waterways Outside Orlando
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Timeline: Early Landmark Events in the Environmental Justice Movement
Ranking
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- How the Race for Renewable Energy is Reshaping Global Politics
- Indigenous Land Rights Are Critical to Realizing Goals of the Paris Climate Accord, a New Study Finds
- To Equitably Confront Climate Change, Cities Need to Include Public Health Agencies in Planning Adaptations
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- The Home Edit's Clea Shearer Shares the Messy Truth About Her Cancer Recovery Experience
- Get Glowing Skin and Save 48% On These Top-Selling Peter Thomas Roth Products
- Berta Cáceres’ Murder Shocked the World in 2016, But the Killing of Environmental Activists Continues
Recommendation
Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
Bebe Rexha Is Gonna Show You How to Clap Back at Body-Shamers
See Pregnant Kourtney Kardashian Bare Her Baby Bump in Bikini Photo
Elevate Your Wardrobe With the Top 11 Trending Amazon Styles Right Now
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Doctors created a primary care clinic as their former hospital struggled
Jury to deliver verdict over Brussels extremist attacks that killed 32
Can TikTokkers sway Biden on oil drilling? The #StopWillow campaign, explained